Wildmind Buddhist Meditation

Get articles emailed to you daily

Site tools

Related articles

Check out our online store!

Blogs

Categories

Vietnam’s dispute with Zen master turns violent

Wildmind Meditation News (August 1, 2009)

AP: Communist Vietnam’s sometimes edgy relationship with religious freedom is being tested in a dispute over a monastery inhabited by disciples of Thich Nhat Hanh, one of the world’s most famous Zen masters.

For four years, the Buddhist monks and nuns at Bat Nha monastery in central Vietnam have been quietly meditating and studying the teachings of the 82-year-old Vietnamese sage who is perhaps the world’s best-known living Buddhist after Tibet’s Dalai Lama.

But lately, they are in a standoff that could test the patience of even the most enlightened.

First, local authorities cut off their power, water and telephones.

Then, a mob descended on their compound with sledgehammers, smashing windows, damaging buildings and threatening occupants.

Communist authorities have ordered the 379 Vietnamese monks to leave the monastery in Vietnam’s Central Highlands. They say the standoff stems from disagreements between two Buddhist factions at the monastery.

But Hanh’s followers believe they are being punished because of Hanh’s praise for the Dalai Lama and his call to broaden religious freedom in Vietnam.

The affair represents a remarkable turnaround from four years ago, when France-based Hanh returned to his native land after 39 years of exile during which he developed a philosophy called “Engaged Buddhism” and sold more than a million books in the West.

In 1966 he had been forced out of what was then U.S.-backed South Vietnam for criticizing the Vietnam War. His return in 2005 made the front pages of state-owned newspapers, and he met with the prime minister.

The abbot at Bat Nha, which belonged to the official Buddhist Church of Vietnam, invited Hanh’s followers to train monks in their brand of Buddhism at the temple there.

Many saw all this as evidence that the Communist government was easing restrictions on religious freedom. Hanh’s supporters spent $1 million to buy land for new buildings and a meditation hall that holds up to 1,800 people.

But the harmony began to unravel last year, Hanh’s followers say. Chinese officials were upset about published comments he made in support of the Dalai Lama and pressured Vietnam to bar the Zen master from addressing an international Buddhist gathering in Hanoi, they say.

In an interview with Italian TV, Hanh had said that Vietnam should allow the Dalai Lama to attend the Hanoi gathering and China should allow the Dalai Lama to return to Tibet to meet with his followers there, just as Hanh was allowed to return to Vietnam.

“I’m sure he knew that speaking out would bring him problems,” said Sister Dang Nghiem, a close Hanh associate who spent six months at Bat Nha.

And soon enough, problems began.

On Oct. 29, 2008, the chairman of Vietnam’s national Committee on Religious Affairs wrote a letter accusing Plum Village, Hanh’s monastery in southern France, of publishing false information about Vietnam on its Web site.

Without mentioning specifics, the letter said the information distorted Vietnam’s policies on religion and could undermine national unity.

The letter also said that Hanh’s followers should leave Bat Nha and stressed that Abbot Duc Nghi, the property’s original owner, wanted them to go.

Nghi could not be reached, and committee members declined to comment, saying they needed several days to arrange an interview.

Sister Dang said the Plum Village followers were taken by surprise when Nghi told them to leave because the abbot had visited the monastery in France two or three times and seemed to respect Hanh.

She theorized that Nghi must have been pressured from above to ask the Plum Village practitioners to leave. Otherwise, she said, any tensions between the two camps could have been resolved.

However, according to Hanh’s supporters, some of Nghi’s followers and other local residents have harassed them intermittently over the last year.

On June 27 the power was cut. Then the compound was raided, and two days later a mob threw rocks and animal excrement at a delegation from the local branch of Vietnam’s official Buddhist church that came to investigate, members of the group said.

Local authorities said it was the abbot who asked for the electricity to be cut, and that it was restored two weeks ago.

But Phap Hoi, a monk at Bat Nha, said in a telephone interview this week that the power was still out.

The animosities may predate last year’s row over the Dalai Lama. A provincial police officer, speaking on condition of anonymity, accused Hanh of breaking Vietnamese law during a 2007 visit when he suggested to President Nguyen Minh Triet that Vietnam abolish government control of religion.

“He should focus on Buddhism and keep out of politics,” the officer said, adding that the monks have until September to relocate.

Hanh’s followers say they’re staying put.

“We just want to practice and do good works,” said Sister Dang. “We want to live together in harmony.”

Hanh denies trying to stir up trouble. In a July 20 letter to his Bat Nha followers he praised them for remaining peaceful and said any notion that they harbored political aims was a “delusion.”

“If you can master the anger in you,” Hanh wrote, “you can give rise to understanding and love.”

Read the rest of this story…

print-friendly format Print this page

online store
Comments: 6

Comments

TD

Comment from TD
Time: September 29, 2009, 11:17 am

That’s karma for you. Thich Nhat Hanh had helped the communist government of Vietnam to get itself removed from the CPC (country of particular concern) list on the abuse of religious freedom so it could join the WTO by coming back and touring the country as though it was a heaven for religions while he knew better. Catholic priests and buddhist monks who advocate religious freedom are either under house arrest or in prison while Thich Nhat Hanh was free to go where he wanted. That said a lot about the relationship between him and the regime. In my opinion, Thich Nhat Hanh is nothing more than a businessman whose product has been Buddhism. A real buddhist, let alone a monk, would not lend a hand to a government that has been responsible for so many astrocities such as the Vietnamese communist government. Thich Nhat Hanh is a fraud whose actions have put thousand of buddhist’s lives of the monastery being attacked in jeopardy.

Bodhipaksa

Comment from Bodhipaksa
Time: September 29, 2009, 11:21 am

I’m rarely impressed by critics who lack the courage and integrity to put their names to their criticisms of others.

TD Nguyen

Comment from TD Nguyen
Time: September 30, 2009, 10:25 am

Dear Bodhipaksa,
Didn’t try to impress anyone, just stating the facts. I’ve been going by my initials all my life. In fact, my email is tdn63@yahoo.com. Do some research on Thich Nhat Hanh yourself. And if you read Vietnamese, go to the Vietnamese language site of his webpage and decide for yourself. What kind of Buddhist, a zen master, that bashes other Buddhist organizations…you don’t see the Dalai Lama do that. For your information, there are several law suits against Thich Nhat Hanh for copy right infringement (i.e. publhishing other people’s works under his name). Again, do the research yourself….and perhaps it is you who lack the courage and integrity to face the true.

TD Nguyen

Comment from TD Nguyen
Time: September 30, 2009, 10:39 am

correction…’the truth.’ And I suppose “Bodhipaksa” is your whole legal name? And by the way, “I’m rarely impressed by” comments that tried to mask the truth by focusing on technicality. All one has to do is some research…any intelligent person would certainly do that before throwing out his or her two-cent worth.

Bodhipaksa

Comment from Bodhipaksa
Time: September 30, 2009, 10:51 am

The internet makes it very easy for people to hide behind anonymity while making critical comments of others, and I see you’re still choosing to hide behind initials. Even I know that Nguyen is an extremely common name.

I make no defense of TNH since I don’t know much about him, and I certainly can’t read Vietnamese to check out the site you mentioned. I did Google “Thich Hant Hanh lawsuit copyright” but couldn’t find any information indicating that there were such lawsuits. I’ve also never heard him disparaging other Buddhist groups. Feel free to post links backing up these assertions.

Bodhipaksa

Comment from Bodhipaksa
Time: September 30, 2009, 11:01 am

I legally changed my name to “Bodhipaksa” (no first name) in 1993, but I hardly think there’s a question of my using anonymity to make criticisms of others. My name, photographs, and biographical details are posted on this website and in many other places. But that seems to be a distraction from your main point. Let me help you stay on track…

As for “the truth,” all you have done is anonymously made assertions. We’ve no way of knowing whether they are true or not. If there are lawsuits, for example, then this must surely be a matter of public record and you can point us to a newspaper article confirming that? How many copyright infringements, for example, has TNH been found guilty of? Can you point us to specific passages where TNH disparages other Buddhist groups?

The onus, by the way, is on the person making allegations to substantiate them. It’s not my job to run around doing research every time someone makes an allegation about a spiritual teacher.

Write a comment



(Not published)