Vietnam’s dispute with Zen master turns violent
Wildmind Meditation News (August 1, 2009)AP: Communist Vietnam’s sometimes edgy relationship with religious freedom is being tested in a dispute over a monastery inhabited by disciples of Thich Nhat Hanh, one of the world’s most famous Zen masters.
For four years, the Buddhist monks and nuns at Bat Nha monastery in central Vietnam have been quietly meditating and studying the teachings of the 82-year-old Vietnamese sage who is perhaps the world’s best-known living Buddhist after Tibet’s Dalai Lama.
But lately, they are in a standoff that could test the patience of even the most enlightened.
First, local authorities cut off their power, water and telephones.
Then, a mob descended on their compound with sledgehammers, smashing windows, damaging buildings and threatening occupants.
Comments
Comment from TD
Time: September 29, 2009, 11:17 am
That’s karma for you. Thich Nhat Hanh had helped the communist government of Vietnam to get itself removed from the CPC (country of particular concern) list on the abuse of religious freedom so it could join the WTO by coming back and touring the country as though it was a heaven for religions while he knew better. Catholic priests and buddhist monks who advocate religious freedom are either under house arrest or in prison while Thich Nhat Hanh was free to go where he wanted. That said a lot about the relationship between him and the regime. In my opinion, Thich Nhat Hanh is nothing more than a businessman whose product has been Buddhism. A real buddhist, let alone a monk, would not lend a hand to a government that has been responsible for so many astrocities such as the Vietnamese communist government. Thich Nhat Hanh is a fraud whose actions have put thousand of buddhist’s lives of the monastery being attacked in jeopardy.
Comment from Bodhipaksa
Time: September 29, 2009, 11:21 am
I’m rarely impressed by critics who lack the courage and integrity to put their names to their criticisms of others.
Comment from TD Nguyen
Time: September 30, 2009, 10:25 am
Dear Bodhipaksa,
Didn’t try to impress anyone, just stating the facts. I’ve been going by my initials all my life. In fact, my email is tdn63@yahoo.com. Do some research on Thich Nhat Hanh yourself. And if you read Vietnamese, go to the Vietnamese language site of his webpage and decide for yourself. What kind of Buddhist, a zen master, that bashes other Buddhist organizations…you don’t see the Dalai Lama do that. For your information, there are several law suits against Thich Nhat Hanh for copy right infringement (i.e. publhishing other people’s works under his name). Again, do the research yourself….and perhaps it is you who lack the courage and integrity to face the true.
Comment from TD Nguyen
Time: September 30, 2009, 10:39 am
correction…’the truth.’ And I suppose “Bodhipaksa” is your whole legal name? And by the way, “I’m rarely impressed by” comments that tried to mask the truth by focusing on technicality. All one has to do is some research…any intelligent person would certainly do that before throwing out his or her two-cent worth.
Comment from Bodhipaksa
Time: September 30, 2009, 10:51 am
The internet makes it very easy for people to hide behind anonymity while making critical comments of others, and I see you’re still choosing to hide behind initials. Even I know that Nguyen is an extremely common name.
I make no defense of TNH since I don’t know much about him, and I certainly can’t read Vietnamese to check out the site you mentioned. I did Google “Thich Hant Hanh lawsuit copyright” but couldn’t find any information indicating that there were such lawsuits. I’ve also never heard him disparaging other Buddhist groups. Feel free to post links backing up these assertions.
Comment from Bodhipaksa
Time: September 30, 2009, 11:01 am
I legally changed my name to “Bodhipaksa” (no first name) in 1993, but I hardly think there’s a question of my using anonymity to make criticisms of others. My name, photographs, and biographical details are posted on this website and in many other places. But that seems to be a distraction from your main point. Let me help you stay on track…
As for “the truth,” all you have done is anonymously made assertions. We’ve no way of knowing whether they are true or not. If there are lawsuits, for example, then this must surely be a matter of public record and you can point us to a newspaper article confirming that? How many copyright infringements, for example, has TNH been found guilty of? Can you point us to specific passages where TNH disparages other Buddhist groups?
The onus, by the way, is on the person making allegations to substantiate them. It’s not my job to run around doing research every time someone makes an allegation about a spiritual teacher.


Write a comment