Buddhism’s dirty secret


One of the things that makes Buddhism an attractive spiritual path for people in the west is its historical track record as a peaceful religion. You’ll often hear western Buddhists say that Buddhism has never had any holy wars, for example. But there’s a but…

Certainly, there’s nothing in the Buddha’s teaching to support violence. In essence, Buddhism is a religion of peace whose teachings have no place even for “righteous anger” or violence as a means of self-defense. As the Buddha said,

“Monks, even if bandits were to savagely sever you, limb by limb, with a double-handled saw, even then, whoever of you harbors ill will at heart would not be upholding my Teaching. Monks, even in such a situation you should train yourselves thus: ‘Neither shall our minds be affected by this, nor for this matter shall we give vent to evil words, but we shall remain full of concern and pity, with a mind of love, and we shall not give in to hatred.”

But there have been historical instances of Buddhists resorting to violence, or supporting violence. And there are instances of that in recent times, and those are going on right now. In the recent past there’s been ethnic cleansing in Bhutan, ethnic conflict in Sri Lanka, and recently two disturbing reports from Burma (or Myanmar): the forced conversions to Buddhism of Christians, and violence and oppression against the Muslim minority.

Greg Constantine, an award-winning photojournalist from the U.S. and currently based in Southeast Asia, has published the first of a two-part series on the plight of the Muslim Rohingya minority, who have faced discrimination in Burma, to the extent that hundreds of thousands have become homeless, many of them spilling over into neighboring Bangladesh, “where they are exploited, unrecognized, denied almost all humanitarian assistance, and in recent years, have faced a growing intolerance toward them by their Bangladeshi hosts.”

In Burma, Constantine says, the Rohingya “face severe restrictions on the right to marry, are subjected to forced labor and arbitrary land seizure and forced displacement, endure excessive taxes and extortion, and are denied the right to travel freely.”


“Most Rohingya are not permitted to travel beyond their village. Family household registers are updated regularly so the authorities know who and how many Rohingya are in each house. Any discrepancies to these records are punishable by fines and arrest.”

This is a disgraceful state of affairs. In a sense, this says nothing about Buddhism, since the principles of Buddhism forbid violence, and since merely adopting the label “Buddhist” does not magically transform people into saints. But in another sense the Burmese government is bringing discredit upon the name of Buddhism by perpetrating these actions. That such suffering is being brought about in a country that proclaims to be Buddhist should be unacceptable to all Buddhists.

Burma has made huge strides forward in the last few years, with the military dictatorship having handed over power to a democratic government. Today, Aung San Suu Kyi, who spent 15 years under house arrest for opposing military rule in Burma, is at the White House to meet President Obama and receive the Congressional Gold Medal. Buddhists should hope that she is being asked for an accounting of recent anti-Christian and anti-Muslim actions in Burma, and how they can be ended. This is not to suggest that Suu Kyi is in any way responsible for these actions, or that she approves of them. I’m sure she isn’t, and doesn’t. The forces of reaction in Burma are still strong, with the military insisting on holding 25% of seats in the country’s government, and it’s possible that she’s not in a position to affect these unjust policies. But questions should be asked.

Thein Sein, Burma’s president, is attending the annual gathering of world leaders at the U.N. General Assembly in New York next week, presenting another opportunity for Burma to be asked to account for the actions of its security forces. The pressures that helped Burma move from military dictatorship to fragile democracy can perhaps help stop further human rights violations.

, , ,

4 Comments. Leave new

  • I feel that – just like with every religious system – it’s always less about the religion itself and more about how people interpret it, which can sometimes not be in the ‘right’ light at all. This is the reason for any kind of religious fundamentalism and extremism. It’s sad.

  • The comment “recent anti-Christian and anti-Muslim actions in Burma” is a slightly coloured description of what is probably better described as a rising of frictions between deeply impoverished groups within a country kept oppressed for decades. Recent clashes have seen deaths on both sides. Both sides fear the other.

    Genocide Watch has grave concerns for the safety and security of minorities in Burma. The need for greater reform within Burma is not so much a Buddhist problem as one of governance and transparency. There is a pressing need for wealth creation and the greater building of social capital, including education in tolerance and human rights.

    Is Buddhist doctrine up to the job of providing a basis for civil society? One would have to hope so, and dhamma is a good basis to encourage greater reform. However, one would have to ask, in the face of actions by western governments on occasion, how well do we Buddhists do at dissuading governments from measures that work against human rights in our own countries?

    • “Both sides fear the other” is true, but only one side is massively outnumbered, and only one side (the same one) has been uprooted in huge numbers and forced into becoming refugees. Your statement sounds like a false equivalency.

      I think it’s good to consider the “frictions” as affected by poverty. I’m sure this is the case. But there’s a general tendency in parts of the Buddhist world at the moment (Bhutan, Sri Lanka, Burma) to seek ethic and religious purity, and I’m not convinced that economics is at the root of all of this.

  • i hv in lived srilanka many years noted thst majority of budhist are racist. thats the only reason they killed thousands of inocent hindus in 1983 riots. they still the same. i feel there is something wrong in the teaching of budhism as far as racism is concerned in many budhist nations.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Fill out this field
Fill out this field
Please enter a valid email address.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.