Recently Euan, whom I don’t know, wrote a comment expressing his dismay at a girl turning him down because he was “too nice.” Here’s what he wrote:
I only started meditating in December 2014 and was seeing this girl for a while, we went on a couple of dates, the first went well and the second went ok. We continued messaging each other but she seemed less keen, then today she told me she felt we didn’t click and didn’t want to meet again. She said I paid her too many compliments and was too nice. I’m just so angry because I felt like she was leading me on and we had been speaking for at least two months as I first met her in December but I went home to university and so didn’t see her again until 2 weeks ago where we had the two dates and I thought things seemed to be going well. I just want to know what I’m supposed to think I guess. From what I’ve learned for my short period of meditation is that we should love each other, but when someone tells me they don’t want a relationship because I’m “too nice” it makes me question what I’m doing. Like should I stop being nice to girls I want potential relationships with, and how am I supposed to not get angry at her for me being too nice. What is so wrong with the world that people don’t like being treated nicely, it perplexes me.
Sorry if this doesn’t read smoothly, I’m writing this immediately after I found out and my almost immediate reaction was to question how I am supposed to think like a Buddhist when bad things happen to me for being too nice.
Euan’s comment raised questions that I thought are worth exploring in a blog post.
Euan’s experience is not unique. I’ve been there myself in the past, and when I was young I found myself astonished and sometimes angry at the way some women I’ve been interested in gravitated to men who seemed to me to be jerks. And although my anger never turned into a general hatred of women, this evidently happens with some men. But I still had a lot to learn.
So I want to talk about “being nice,” from the point of view of a man who’s realized that “being nice” is not as “nice” as “nice men” like to think it is. I’m not advocating being unkind, and certainly not advocating ill will or hatred. I’d like to talk about how “being nice” is not actually kind, is a form of manipulation, and is not, in most cases, what women need or want. And I’m sorry, Euan, but some of this may be hard to read. I don’t mean to be unkind or to hurt your feelings, but instead want to act as a kalyana mitta (spiritual friend) who points out things we need to know but may not want to know.
What’s a “nice guy”? A “nice guy” is a man who thinks that the way into a girl’s heart (and bed) is by being agreeable and flattering. Here are a few characteristics of “nice guys,” drawn from a Wikihow article:
The psychology of “nice guys” has been written about a lot. Here’s a great analysis of the whole phenomenon from Geek Feminism Wiki.
Being a “nice guy” is a strategy. It’s not who someone fundamentally is, although “nice guys” are very conscious of and attached to their identity (self view) as “nice guys.”
The purpose of the strategy, as I’ve said, is to attract and keep a woman. A cartoon by Callmekitto about “nice guys” shows a woman jubilantly holding up a card, similar to one of those “Buy ten cups of coffee and get one free” cards. She’s saying to the young man beside her, “That’s the eight stamp on your Nice Guy Card! Now you can stop pretending to care about me as a person and we can have all that sex you deserve!”
Cartoon by Lauren Dombrowski, @callmekitto at Tumblr
The cartoon is brutally frank, but it’s making the point that acting as a “nice guy” assumes that relationships are a form of transaction: I’ll pretend to be the kind of person I think you want, and then you’ll give me sex and approval.
As the cartoon indicates, the man who is playing at being a “nice guy” isn’t actually relating to the woman as a full human being. He’s not being himself, and may even have lost touch with who he is. He doesn’t want to express his needs and won’t challenge his intended partner in any way because he thinks that risks pushing her away. In fact the opposite is the case. Few women want a partner who doesn’t express himself and who avoids conflict. A conflict-averse partner is neither going to stand up for you not stand up to you.
The “nice guy” is far from practicing metta, or kindness. Metta is based on empathy (anukampa), which is an awareness of the other person as a person — as a feeling being who has needs. In fact the “nice guy” role is based on craving. You desperately want something (sex, companionship, approval, the status of “being in a relationship”) and you go through the moves that you think will get you that thing. But there’s no actual awareness of the other person, which is unattractive, and so as a “nice guy” you’re constantly finding that you don’t get what you want. In fact it’s not just that you want the things I’ve mentioned: you deserve them. After all, you’ve given the endless compliments, you’ve refrained from expressing what you really want in just about any situation (“No, any movie you choose is fine with me!”), you’ve studiously avoided expressing any needs (“No, it’s not a problem that you stood me up”). You’ve been nice. You’ve cranked the handle on the machine, and how it’s time for your reward!
When the reward doesn’t come the first few times, you might be depressed. But then you get angry — but not just at the girls who rejected you, because you start to realize that almost no girl is going to give you what you deserve. And you do, you think, deserve the sex and the love you want, because you’re not even conscious that “nice guy” is a role you’re playing, and you think it’s who you are. So you both want and hate women, or “bitches,” as you may think of them. As another cartoon (actually it’s more of a “meme”) says, “Women never date nice guys like me. I hate those bitches.” Frustrated craving turns to hatred.
I want to re-emphasize that the “nice guy” is a role that men play. It’s not who they fundamentally are. So in criticizing the actions of “nice guys,” I’m not saying that there’s something irretrievably flawed about them. Just that they need to so some work in becoming more self-aware, braver, more honest, and more genuinely empathetic and loving.
The Wikihow post I linked to above has some advice for stepping out of the “nice guy” role, but I’ll say just a few words about developing the qualities I just mentioned.
Euan said, “From what I’ve learned for my short period of meditation is that we should love each other, but when someone tells me they don’t want a relationship because I’m ‘too nice’ it makes me question what I’m doing. Like should I stop being nice to girls I want potential relationships with.”
Buddhism does teach us to have metta (kindness) and karuna (compassion) and to be empathetic, but that doesn’t mean “being nice” and it certainly doesn’t mean “being manipulative.”
The men a “nice guy” thinks of as “jerks” — the ones they see girls with all the time — are more enjoyable for just about any human being to be with, let alone a romantic partner, than any self-consciously “nice guy.” They aren’t acting. They’re more inclined to be honest about what they want and feel. When they give compliments it feels sincere because they’re not doing it all the time. They offer challenge. They call out bullshit. We all need that.
I’m not saying that every “jerk” is really a good guy. Some jerks cheat or are violent. Those are real jerks. But even a real jerk might be more fulfilling to be in a relationship with than someone you don’t know because they’re constantly playing a role, and when there’s the underlying threat, which isn’t that hard to pick up on, that they’ll turn nasty when they don’t get what they want. Better the devil you know than the one pretending to be “nice” all the time, perhaps.
So being a “nice guy” isn’t nice. It’s fake. So yes, “nice guys” should stop being “nice.” But that doesn’t mean being unkind. It doesn’t mean treating people badly. It means becoming self-aware. It means “manning up” and having the courage to be honest so that you can be in a genuine relationship with another human being rather than acting out a role in order to get a reward.
Mahāyāna Buddhism emphasizes compassion, and yet it portrays awakened beings who look anything but peaceful…
Here are things I try to observe in my own communication online, especially around politics.…
It’s hard not to get overwhelmed by what's going on in the world. Politics is…
I am launching a major new course for 2026, on the topic of how we…
One of my students just let me know that there is a group of Buddhist…
I've been practicing and teaching self-compassion for a long time now. My book on that…
View Comments
Bodhipaksa,
By this logic, you are not a "teacher". It is simply a role you adopt so that we, your listening practitioners, do not disapprove of the unskillfulness of the words and actions you use in generalizing specific traits into a overarching stereotype that you insist is correct and then perpetuate as inner misunderstanding of some greater truth.
I am not implying that you calling yourself a "teacher" is disingenuous, but you don't seem to be teaching, so much as demonstrating that your worldview is not terribly compassionate towards these men. Is this "strategy" not simply you projecting your own behaviors that are not intrinsic to the self? Or is this simply the way you choose to be willfully disingenuous? By claiming to be a compassionate teacher while demonizing and perpetuating stereotypical behaviors without looking inward to see that you are guilt of the same ideals, but towards a different subject. Ie: "do what I say, not what I do."
Please clarify further.
Uh, what?
great post! thanks a lot Bodhipaska. it was very helpful to me and certainly some dots were connected as a result of this read.
I was also blaming the women in my life for a long time instead of realizing how much of it all were because of my actions and decisions in that matter. I am so grateful for understanding it now and being able to see more clearly who I am and what I want.
Some of my relationships got a lot better and much more real since I separated the "persona" I have created from the "real me". It's liberating and and easier, actually. :)
Great post and very insightful to me as a woman. I find it refreshing to read this analysis in terms of male behaviour as the words chosen are different from those when discussing female behaviour. The things people of both genders do when desiring love and approval may differ in form, the root causes and structures underlying it are most probably very much the same. It's insightful ànd fun to think of things I did in terms of 'wanting to get in bed' with someone - also I'm very happy with the advice to 'man up' rather than reading advice that plays on prejudices about how women should use supposedly 'female charms' in order to be attractive to men. I like the 'balls' of this text. Thanks.
Wow. Just wow. I'm in my mid 20's and this article just blew my mind. It 100% describes how I have been throughout all my teenage years up until now... I've never been able to have a lasting relationship and I somehow always knew it was in a way my fault, but I could never identify what it was that I was doing wrong. Yes, I once got dumped in high school for being "too nice" and it should have raised a big red flag, but it didn't. Looking back at all my past relationships this is absolutely spot on... This article should seriously be a mandatory read for every young man out there. The sad part is that I've been slowly developing resentment towards woman in general, even knowing I'm the one at fault. Thank you so much for writing this
You're welcome, Shawn.
Brilliant! You have just clarified an important point(s) that has plagued me for many years. The subsequent trickle down effect of understanding is both elating and liberating! Thank you and Namaste!
Hi. Im a women who spend five years with Mr Nice Guy untill recently . I have blame myself for getting angry on him ,lost my respect and then slowly my sexinterest for him too. I felt so quilty as I was "together with The nicest guy ever". He did every thing I said, to please me, never stood up for him self never pointed out what he felt (when things were not so good that is...). I couldnt understand why I felt so angry in side of me, angry at him. It came to that point that I really disrespected him and broke up. He wasnt even angry then. Never confronted me. Just kept on going being nice and hoped for us to be a couple again. Well at some point after breaking up he was not a complete whimp I meen he did have some guys . I just wonder: how do Nice guys feel when they get the truth right in their face? Does it help? Do the feel bad? Im mot sure how the act and think when someone hit the spot and tell them the truth?
From sweden so sorry for my swinglish!
/C
Your Swinglish is excellent, Clarissa!
How nice guys respond varies from person to person. Some switch over to hatred and blame. Scratch the surface of those nice guys and you find a raging misogynist! Others can cling to their "niceness" much longer, as yours did. In between those extremes are some that will feel deeply hurt and confused that you've rejected them.
You need to communicate to her fish brain - her ancient status evaluation subsystem.
Treat a woman like shit and her amygdala lights up - by displaying that you don't care if you lose her by being rude, you are subcommunicating that you have a high status.
Women want a man that is better than her in every way. The default contempt women have for men can only be overcome by outdoing her in the game - you need to look down on her, only this will get her gushing
It goes against everything you have learned, but it's true.
This is hilarious, Damien. Thanks for a good chuckle. I really needed that.
I came upon this page as I was looking for suggestions for meditation with somebody who finds himself to be suffering from “Mr Nice Guy” Syndrome as per described in the book “No More Mr Nice Guy”,
According to the book there are 2 types of ‘Nice guys’. The one who is fully aware of what they are doing, and the strategy they are applying. And the 2nd one (Me) where I don’t see it. It’s all buried deep down in my subconscious. I walk around thinking I’m a am truly a good person. But I carry in my subconscious a strong sense of not being worthy, yet I am not aware of it.
Simple example : I don’t have a drivers license. (I’m in my 40ies). In my consciousness I don’t deny myself this at all: I even have the books, BUT, I always find a reason why ‘now’ is not a good time. I’ve done this for 20ish years. As I understand it, what’s really going on is that my deep subconscious doesn’t think I am worthy of it. Therefore actively makes sure that outcome doesn’t happen, distraction/excuses/procrastination is one of it’s tactics to prevent me from getting to my goal of getting the license.
So I never end up with a drives license, and in my consciousness I believe it’s cause I am too busy, or whatever distractions of life are keeping me away. Never do I realize that “I am not worthy”.
I was wondering about how to expose my hidden emotions and learn to recognize, and thereby observe and be very careful what I do in those moments. Either by learning to ‘see’ them, through self emotional meditation, but that seem to be more of conscious feelings.
I am considering of starting to do metta meditation but only focus on me, and only do positive affirmation that would be in opposite of self denial and negative self-emotions, not the traditional 'may I be free from suffering' etc. in the hope of chipping away at an emotion I can't directly access.
Thanks for any thoughts or suggestions.
I haven't read that book. It sounds interesting, thanks.
You wrote, "I carry in my subconscious a strong sense of not being worthy, yet I am not aware of it." I think that's an almost universal experience. You're not alone, in other words. But we do tend to think we're worse than other people because we only see what's on the surface (which is often very selective) and don't have access to their inner life.
There are really three things I'd suggest:
Hello, interesting viewpoint. I believe if you're a practicing lay Buddhist it is proper that you try to date people who hold similar values and goals than you do. Not necessarily Buddhist but people that respect your path and your practice.
The Buddha listed in the suttas the qualities a couple should possess to have a fruitful relationship or marriage if they want to meet again in the afterlife:
"Householders, if wife and husband want to see each other in both this life and the next, they should be equals in faith, ethical conduct, generosity, and wisdom.
When both are faithful and kind,
disciplined, living properly,
then wife and husband
say nice things to each other.
They get all the things they need,
so they live at ease.
Their enemies are downhearted,
when both are equal in ethics.
Having practiced the teaching here,
both equal in precepts and observances,
they delight in the heavenly realm,
enjoying all the pleasures they desire.”
-AN 4:55
It's definitely helpful if people who are dating at least respect each others' values.